 When to Consider Surgical Management |
| |
Surgical management is regarded as the second line treatment of OSA patients, reserved for those who could not tolerate PAP machines therapy, or those who want a one-off solution to the OSA problem without resorting to everyday uses of PAP machines.
The advantages of surgical management is that it offered a almost one-off treatment options that could potentially have long lasting effects in treating obstructive sleep aponea. Unlike PAP machines which can overcome almost any kinds of obstructions in the airway, the surgical patients must have the locations and patterns of obstruction correctly identified and properly dealt with before a good results would be expected. So it poses a more challenging goal in making the right diagnosis of what is causing the obstruction, and making the right choices of surgical procedures that correctly deal with the specific type of obstruction.
Furthermore, surgical management is regarded as successful with a reduction of 50% or more in the RDI, and abolishing almost all of the desaturation episodes. More than 80% of patients will be able to experience marked symptomatic improvement. The reduction in RDI although is not complete, can convert the moderate and severe OSA into the mild to moderate severity. Since the mortality rate of heart attacks and stroke are very high in patient suffering from severe OSA, yet the mortality rate is similar between normal and mild OSA patients, so surgical management is still considered as a good and safe management options for OSA patients. |
 Which Procedures to Choose |
| |
For most of the patients who suffer from obstructive sleep aponea, they have obstructions at multiple level and multiple sites, hence frequently require more than one procedures or even more than one stage of surgery to achieve satisfactory result.
Our experienced consultant will decide and recommend the suitable procedures for the patient to overcome obstructions at various sites with various patterns. |
 Sleep Surgery |
| |
After thorough assessment by history taking, physical examination, sleep study and endoscopic assessment of the obstructed airways, the sites of obstruction will be determined and are usually classified into nasal, velopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal levels, each require different procedures to overcome different patterns of obstruction. |
 Nasal Surgery |
| |
| Nasal obstruction is a symptoms commonly encountered in patient suffereing from obstructive sleep aponea. This stand alone will not cause severe obstructive sleep aponea but could often make the OSA worse. If the nasal obstruction is not well controlled by medical treatment then surgery will be indicated.
|
 Septoplasty |
| |
Overview – correction of deviated nasal septum, commonly performed with turbinectomy in the treatment of nasal obstruction
Who need this operation – nasal obstruction as a result or partly contributed by deviated nasal septum
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, infection, septal perforation, nose saddling, recurrence of symptoms |
 Turbinectomy |
| |
Overview – resection of hypertrophic turbinate to relief nasal obstruction. It is commonly performed with septoplasty to achieve satisfactory result.
Who need this operation – significant nasal obstruction as a result of turbinate hypertrophy
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, infection, recurrence of nasal symptoms |
 Laser Turbinectomy |
| |
Overview – partial shrinkage of turbinate with laser technology. This is a repeatable procedure and did not preclude more radical procedure like turbinectomy.
Who need this operation – nasal obstruction mainly contributed by turbinate hypertrophy
Surgical risk and possible complications – crusting, recurrence of symptoms |
 RF Turbinate |
| |
Overview – partial shrinkage of turbinate with radiofrequency technology. This is a repeatable procedure and did not preclude more radical procedure like turbinectomy
Who need this operation – nasal obstruction mainly contributed by turbinate hypertrophy
Surgical risk and possible complications – crusting, recurrence of symptoms |
 Velopharyngeal |
| |
| This is the site referring to the area behind the uvula and around the tonsils. This is the most frequent level of obstruction in OSA patient and can be affected by various pattern of obstruction, where many different procedures are designed to handle different patterns of obstruction.
|
 Adenoidectomy |
| |
Overview – removal of adenoid tissue
Who need this operation – children suffering from OSA, or adults with significant adenoid hypertrophy causing velopharyngeal obstruction.
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, infection, recurrence of symptoms |
 Tonsillectomy |
| |
Overview – removal of the whole tonsils
Who need this operation – treatment of OSA in children, enlarged tonsils in adults, or as part of the procedure in UPPP and other more advanced velopharyngeal procedures.
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation, recurrence of symptoms |
 Pillar Implant |
| |
Overview – implantation of 3 short strips of artificial fibre into the soft palate, which will induce fibrosis and stiffening of soft palate 6 weeks after the procedure
Who need this operation – snoring and mild OSA patient with normal nasal passage, small tonsils, normal uvula, good depth and width at velopharynx
Surgical risk and possible complications – extrusion, recurrence of symptoms |
 Uvulectomy |
| |
Overview – resection of uvula
Who need this operation – snoring and mild OSA patient with normal velopharynx except long and thick uvula
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation and recurrence of symptoms |
 Modified CAPSO |
| |
Overview – a limited procedure on the soft palate mucosa to stiffen the soft palate and in a smaller extent pulling the uvula into a more anterior position
Who need this operation – patient with snoring and mild aponea with normal velopharynx except a mild deficiency in depth
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation and recurrence of symptoms |
 Uvulopalatopharyngoplsty UPPP |
| |
Overview – removal of tonsils and uvula and redundant soft tissue in velopharynx
Who need this operation – patient with enlarged tonsils and thick and long uvula causing velopharyngeal obstruction, or as an initial procedure for expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty, dorsal palatal flap and lateral pharyngoplasty
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation and recurrence of symptoms |
 Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty |
| |
Overview – a procedure in the tonsil area aiming to deal with the lateral wall collapse
Who need this operation – velopharyngeal obstruction with lateral collapse
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, recurrence of symptoms, regurgitation |
 Dorsal Palatal Flap |
| |
Overview – a procedure in the tonsil area aiming to increase the palatal height and width at velopharynx
Who need this operation – velopharyngeal obstruction with insufficient height and width of velopharynx
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation, recurrence of symptoms |
 Lateral Pharyngoplasty |
| |
Overview – a procedure to the tonsil area aiming to increase the palatal width and height.
Who need this operation – velopharyngeal obstruction with insufficient height and width of velopharynx
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation, recurrence of symptoms |
 Palatal Advancement Pharyngoplasty |
| |
Overview – by removing a 1 cm segment of bone from the posterior end of the hard palate, the soft palate was then reattached to the hard palate and creating a good depth for the velopharynx
Who need this operation – velopharyngeal obstruction with little depth but enough width
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitaion, recurrence of symptoms, oro-nasal fistula (very rare) |
 LAUP |
| |
Overview – Laser removal of the uvula under local anesthetic
Who need this operation – snoring and mild OSA patient with normal velopharynx but excessively long and thick uvula
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, infection, regurgitation, recurrence of OSA and snoring symptoms |
 RF Soft Palate |
| |
Overview – by employing radiofrequency technology to achieve volume reduction and stiffening in the soft palate with minimal pain, bleeding and ulcer
Who need this operation – snoring and mild OSA patients with normal velopharynx
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding and pain are minimal. Uvula ulcer is uncommon. |
 Hypopharyngeal |
| |
| Hypopharyngeal area referred to the area below the tonsils to the entrance of trachea, bounded by the base and posterior third of tongue, the epiglottis and the posterior pharyngeal wall. This level is more commonly obstructed in patient with moderate to severe obstructive sleep aponea.
|
 Genioglossus Advancement |
| |
Overview – the tongue and the epiglottitis was pulled forward to increase the depth of the hypopharynx
Who need this operation – patient with hypopharyngeal obstruction particularly with receding chin and a normal size tongue
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, recurrence |
 Thyrohyoid Suspension |
| |
Overview – an anterior neck operation aims to displace the whole tongue anteriorly and tilted slightly inferiorly, and fixed with stitches
Who need this operation – tongue base and hypopharyngeal obstruction with normal size tongue and chin
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, infection, pain, recurrence fixation stitches break |
 Midline Glossectomy |
| |
Overview – removal of tissue in the midline of the posterior third of tongue using radiofrequency plasma technology with removal of enlarged lingual tonsils
Who need this operation – hypopharyngeal obstruction with enlarged posterior third of tongue and overgrowth of lingual tonsils
Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, pain, choking and aspiration, taste change and numbness in tongue |
 RF Tongue Base |
| |
Overview – employing radiofrequency technology to achieve tongue base volume reduction with minimal pain and bleeding under local anesthesia. Multiple sessions are usually required to achieve satisfactory result
Who need this operation – patients with thick enlarged tongue
Surgical risk and possible complications – pain and bleeding are minimal. Ulcers are usually transient and small. Taste change and tongue numbness are rarely encounted. |
 Laser Epiglottoplasty |
| |
Overview – this procedures involves surgical trimming of the epiglottis usually employing laser and performed under general anesthesia.
Who need this operation – patients with excessively long epiglottitis and narrow depth in the hypopharynx Surgical risk and possible complications – bleeding, infections are aspiration and choking |